American Voice for Freedom
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Your Representatives
  • Register to Vote
  • Donate
  • Contact
  • Dedication
← Sixth Circuit declares bump stocks are not machine guns; Agency interpretations of criminal statutes are subject to judicial review
Companies doing business in a state submit to state court jurisdiction in products liability suits →
March 30, 2021 · 7:29 pm

Application of physical force with intent to restrain is a Fourth Amendment seizure even if unsuccessful


Opinion:
ROXANNE TORRES
v.
JANICE MADRID, ET AL

Comments Off on Application of physical force with intent to restrain is a Fourth Amendment seizure even if unsuccessful

Filed under Current Events

← Sixth Circuit declares bump stocks are not machine guns; Agency interpretations of criminal statutes are subject to judicial review
Companies doing business in a state submit to state court jurisdiction in products liability suits →

  • Facebook
  • Recent Posts

    • Sixth Circuit: Free speech and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment protect in-class speech of public university professors
    • Companies doing business in a state submit to state court jurisdiction in products liability suits
    • Application of physical force with intent to restrain is a Fourth Amendment seizure even if unsuccessful
    • Sixth Circuit declares bump stocks are not machine guns; Agency interpretations of criminal statutes are subject to judicial review
    • DC Circuit affirms Houston man’s conviction for theft of trade secrets in Chinese “Thousand Talents” conspiracy
  • Smartphone / Tablet users : Selected documents and reports will appear in your "downloads" folder if your browser doesn't support .PDF

American Voice for Freedom · "Half the Truth is often a great Lie"