Evidence seized incident to arrest after discovery of a valid warrant is admissible even when the stop of the individual was unconstitutional

Opinion:
UTAH
v.
EDWARD JOSEPH STRIEFF, JR.

Comments Off on Evidence seized incident to arrest after discovery of a valid warrant is admissible even when the stop of the individual was unconstitutional

Filed under Current Events

← Courts should only give deference to the determinations of agencies that Congress has authorized to administer statutes when the agency’s rules are procedurally sound

Hobbs Act’s commerce element is satisfied when a defendant commits a robbery that targets a drug dealer’s inventory or proceeds →

Search for:
Recent Posts

Smartphone / Tablet users : Selected documents and reports will appear in your "downloads" folder if your browser doesn't support .PDF

American Voice for Freedom · "Half the Truth is often a great Lie"

Evidence seized incident to arrest after discovery of a valid warrant is admissible even when the stop of the individual was unconstitutional

Recent Posts