June 19, 2014 · 7:55 pm

When a bankruptcy court is presented with a counterclaim for tortious interference it may issue proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, subject to “de novo” review by the District Court


Opinion:
EXECUTIVE BENEFITS INSURANCE AGENCY
v.
PETER H. ARKISON, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE
OF THE ESTATE OF BELLINGHAM INSURANCE
AGENCY, INC.

Comments Off on When a bankruptcy court is presented with a counterclaim for tortious interference it may issue proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, subject to “de novo” review by the District Court

Filed under Current Events